Morning Consult Counter/Consensus: Global Political Risk Briefing, July 11, 2024
Morning Consult Counter/Consensus is a biweekly briefing that leverages our global analysis and Political Intelligence data to spotlight counter-consensus takes on major (geo)political developments, and affirm consensus views on issues for which data has been scarce in public discourse or otherwise adds value. The briefing is intended to facilitate corporate scenario planning, market and asset price forecasting, and public sector decision-making. Clients are welcome to reach out directly with questions.
You can subscribe here.
Key Takeaways
BRICS (Counter): Most BRICS members favor the U.S. over China
France (Counter): Egalité holds strong. Fraternité will be challenged
NATO/Ukraine (Counter): More adults in NATO member countries than not want to admit Ukraine, even U.S. Republicans
1. BRICS (Counter)
Another BRIC in the wall? Brazil, Russia, India and China are the original BRICs, a term coined by an economist to denote large, rapidly developing nations presenting investment opportunities. In an example of essence preceding existence, the group has since become more of an intergovernmental organization. South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates are also now members. Malaysia and Thailand, along with a number of other countries, have recently expressed an interest in joining.
Increasingly, the media has portrayed the group as a Chinese-led, developing country counterweight to U.S. leadership in the G7 and to Western governance of the international order more broadly. However, public opinion in most of the current member states (five out of six, if we exclude China’s opinion of itself) is more favorable toward the United States than toward China. Russia is the only other BRICS member where the public prefers China. And while prospective member Malaysia is more pro-China, Thais hold positive opinions of both, but with slightly more favorable views of America on net.
Net favorability toward China and the United States
Presidents Xi and Putin may indeed be trying to leverage the BRICS as a budding hedge against the West. But contrary to the prevailing media narrative, most of the newly admitted BRICS countries where we collect data on the issue are more likely to favor the United States than the self-styled leader of the developing world, with a mixed outlook among aspirants.
All in all they’re just another…well, you know how it goes.
2. France (Counter)
A French twist. France’s far right had a quick response to those relieved by the recent election results: “We’re not going anywhere.” Indeed, the National Rally won more parliamentary seats than any other single party, and despite being shut out of an absolute majority and the premiership, they will be making their voice heard in the Assemblée Nationale. Furthermore, the success of the far left and the shrinking political center presage intense political battles.
But not over everything. Our monthly data on French adults’ policy preferences shows that there is widespread agreement across the republic’s political spectrum on principles related to equality, workers’ rights, and the state’s role in the economy. There is, however, sharp disagreement on cultural pluralism and immigration, in line with deepening debates about the role of “le wokisme” in French society and political discourse.
The French left and right mostly agree on economic and labor issues
Diversity and globalism divide French society along ideological lines
The Paris Olympics — taking place in less than three weeks — will be the government’s most immediate challenge. But whoever takes over the French premiership will have to address the issues that drove millions of voters to support the far right, including concerns over the cost of living, discontent by France’s farmers, anger over pension reform, and of course, immigration policy, even as other areas show a higher degree of left-right alignment. It won’t be smooth sailing.
3. NATO/Ukraine (Counter)
Birthday party pooper. As NATO celebrates its 75th birthday at the summit in Washington, D.C. this week, there are two elephants in the room: The lingering question mark over Ukraine’s evential membership and a possible second term for former President Donald Trump, famously a NATO skeptic.
Public sympathies lie with Ukraine, but opinions on membership are uncertain. In general, adults in six member countries where we surveyed the public on Ukrainian NATO membership are more likely than not to support it. Adults in the United Kingdom were the most unsure about offering Ukraine membership by a wide margin, with 49% saying they didn’t know or had no opinion on the matter. Germans expressed the most hesitation, with 1 in 5 strongly opposing it.
Adults in six NATO countries are more likely to support Ukrainian membership than not
Across the Atlantic, the majority of U.S. adults, including a slim majority of Republicans, similarly say they would support admitting Ukraine to NATO, this despite former President Trump’s vocal criticism of it.
While recent history indicates that Republican views would likely shift somewhat to come in line with Trump’s rhetoric if push came to shove, our data suggests there is currently a gap between Trump’s views of NATO and those of his constituents that is worth monitoring, though Democrats are ultimately NATO’s biggest cheerleaders.
Like our data?
Data is a dish best served cold (and ideally via API). That’s why we don’t do hot takes. Please contact us with inquiries regarding Morning Consult’s Political Intelligence data and companion syndicated products, including Morning Consult Pro, the home for our global and U.S. political analysis.
Jason I. McMann leads geopolitical risk analysis at Morning Consult. He leverages the company’s high-frequency survey data to advise clients on how to integrate geopolitical risk into their decision-making. Jason previously served as head of analytics at GeoQuant (now part of Fitch Solutions). He holds a Ph.D. from Princeton University’s Politics Department. Follow him on Twitter @jimcmann. Interested in connecting with Jason to discuss his analysis or for a media engagement or speaking opportunity? Email [email protected].
Sonnet Frisbie is the deputy head of political intelligence and leads Morning Consult’s geopolitical risk offering for Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Prior to joining Morning Consult, Sonnet spent over a decade at the U.S. State Department specializing in issues at the intersection of economics, commerce and political risk in Iraq, Central Europe and sub-Saharan Africa. She holds an MPP from the University of Chicago.
Follow her on Twitter @sonnetfrisbie. Interested in connecting with Sonnet to discuss her analysis or for a media engagement or speaking opportunity? Email [email protected].